Maariv/Adapted 
It is unbelievable. Israel is fighting one of the three Palestinian entities, while the other two entities look on without interfering.

Addressing the Palestinian cause always focuses on the establishment of "one State" or "two States", and the entity takes the Palestinian conflict as an excuse to marginalize the issue of the search for a political settlement, whether the settlement is based on two States or on one State, although it is a matter of concern. 

The public is divided between the options of "one State" or "two States", because Israel does not stand before a single Palestinian front due to the Israeli interventions in the internal Palestinian field that have generated three entities: the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, led by Fatah, the "Hamas State" in the Gaza Strip, and the Arab society in the occupied Palestinian interior.

The Palestinian Authority is the first candidate for the Palestinian sovereignty -for Israel- and Hamas is the result of Israel's repression of the Palestinian national movement represented by Yasser Arafat at the time. Hamas stood aside in the recent escalation in the Gaza Strip, to be recognized as "wise and responsible" in the Gaza Strip, and welcomed the negotiation under Egyptian mediation in the light of the Palestinian Authority's disregard. For Islamic Jihad, it isn't as important as Hamas for Israel. 

It can be inferred from this that there is no reason for us not to continue practicing the imperialist behavior, but Israel's policy of 'divide and conquer' in the internal Palestinian matter will not be the basis for addressing the problems between us and the Palestinians, bearing in mind that our vision is skewed towards the current achievement of the "Breaking Dawn" Operation, we should return the issue of political settlement to the status of the public domain.