Mohammed Awni Abu Oun
The resolutions issued by the Judge of the Magistrates' Court in Occupied Al-Quds disclosed the high levels of extremism that has become invading all the Israeli institutes and integrating each other's roles to pass the Israeli occupation's racial policies against the Palestinians and their holy places. 
The Judge's decision, which approved the colonial right-wing extremists' appeal that they have the right to perform their prayers and Talmudic rituals inside the yards of Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa and that their desecration of Al-Aqsa "does pose risk to public peace," constitutes a clear coup on the "current situation" in Al-Quds, until a radical, final solution is found. 

This decision was cancelled, at the end, not because the right word does justice to the victim in front of the criminal, but because of other political considerations justified by the Judge Einat Afaman-Moler during the appeal against the decision that the freedom of worshipping and performing Jewish rituals is a right; but not absolute, the other occupation's interests must be taken into consideration, and their policies in Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa fit in place and time with every phase in a way that serves the occupation's high goals and interests.  

Those resolutions are not newly created. In fact, the Israeli Judicial sentences form a cover for many of the racial colonial activities that underpin the extreme Jewish organizations, headed by the Temple Mount organizations. They are active in desecrating the Islamic holy places -including Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa- and establishing colonial outposts through approving wide spaces for this goal and attacking the Palestinian villages and cities. 

Israeli courts impose on the Palestinians high fines that are not appropriate to their economic conditions, as well as release hundreds or thousands of demolition orders either at the level of houses or complete villages; under various pretexts. 

Moreover, the Israeli courts discriminate in their sentences between the crimes committed by the colonial settlers and Israeli soldiers against the Palestinians, and the military operations carried out by the Palestinians against the Zionist settlers in response to their attacks and violations. In the first case, we observe that there is a clear tolerance for the settlers who always slip out of accountability; and what is even more silly is the imposition of financial fines that don't exceed a dollar. 

In contrast, the occupation courts issue harsh, extreme sentences against the Palestinians, expand the sanctions to include orders to demolish their houses or parts of them. They also adopt systematic policies of raids, arrests, fines, administrative detention and deportations. 

The judicial crimes against the Palestinians exceeded the alive to include the deaths and martyrs. To illustrate, the Israeli courts issued dozens of sentences to forbid the handing over of the bodies of martyrs or wanted persons to their families; either the ones whose bodies were kidnapped during clashes or the ones who were arrested while injured and then succumbed to their wounds in the Israeli hospitals.

The former crimes present the identification of the Israeli Judiciary with the occupation army and the colonial settlers; against the Palestinians, their rights and holy places in a way that violates the humans' dignity and their ability to live in their lands. Thus, the assassination of Shireen Abu Aqleh and the occupation's attempts with its judicial regimes and investigation committees to evade the crime is a part of a long series of the occupation's doctoring of the judicial institute to serve its interests and cover its crimes. 

Finally, it is no surprise if the right-wing extremist Aylete Shaked, who does not even recognize the existence of the Palestinians over their lands, presided the Judicial Ministry.